data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The notation of accidentals is inaccurate in the majority of the sources, which, however, does not cause any difficulties in the interpretation of the text. In the 2nd half of the bar, GC and FE have only one sign: a before the last chord in the R.H., whereas in FE it restores f2, while in GC – probably erroneously – it raises g
2 to g2. GE added to the
written in GC another one, raising b
2 to b2. Only EE includes all necessary signs. Moreover, all sources include a superfluous
before d1 in the 3rd crotchet in the L.H. In the main text, we omit this sign, in turn, we add a cautionary
before f3 (in the last chord).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in GE, Inaccuracies in FE, GE revisions, Cautionary accidentals, Omission of current key accidentals, Inaccuracies in GC
notation: Pitch