![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : FE revisions
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
FE (except for FE4) lacks in five necessary accidentals – naturals before d2 and b and sharps before f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||
b. 5-6
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the most likely explanation for the existing discrepancy between the sources based on [A] is the sometimes used by the engravers identification of two (or more) following
Due to this fact, in the main text we give the source and stylistically unquestionable indications of GC (→GE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: FE revisions , Hairpins denoting continuation |
||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The version with a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 13
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The missing tie sustaining d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 17-21
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
No slur in FE1 is undoubtedly an oversight of the engraver, corrected – certainly on the basis of [A] – in FE2. However, it is not entirely clear what the range of the slur intended by Chopin was, as the sources based on [A] seem to convey different versions and both the copyist and the engraver of FE did not always faithfully reproduce Chopin's notation. In addition, the slur of GC, despite the fact that it clearly reaches the beginning of bar 21, cannot be considered to be unambiguous – the beginning of the slur also exceeds the bar line, which cannot mean its starting in bar 16. It is the recapitulation that comes to help (bars 205-209), in which the engraver of FE1, looking at the same place of [A], interpreted the slur differently than for the first time, yet in accordance with the more likely, literal interpretation of GC. Due to this fact, in the main text we give the slur reaching until E category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |