![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 198-199
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Deleting the slur over the three-note motif, totally unjustified, as far as the music is concerned, is a possible result of misunderstanding at the proofreading of FE4, whose aim was addition of the tie of b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 216
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
As in bar 28, in the main text we give the notation in GC (→GE) which raises no reservations. The lack of accents in FE is certainly a mistake, and the mark in EE – most probably a long accent – a complement likely by Chopin. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
b. 216
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 216-217
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The slur over the pair of octaves is overlooked in FE1. The mistake was corrected already in FE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
b. 219
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of the c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |