Slurs
|
b. 198-199
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
Deleting the slur over the three-note motif, totally unjustified, as far as the music is concerned, is a possible result of misunderstanding at the proofreading of FE4, whose aim was addition of the tie of b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 208-209
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The shorter slur of GE is, according to us, inaccurate, which can be partially attributed to the sweeping slur of GC. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||
|
b. 216
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 216-217
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The slur over the pair of octaves is overlooked in FE1. The mistake was corrected already in FE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 222-224
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The slur added – most probably by Chopin – in the proofreading of FE3 (→FE4) clearly shows that according to the composer's intention, it was not supposed to reach the next bar. The longer slur of EE may be considered in this situation an inaccurate interpretation of the slur added in the base text by Chopin (cf. bars 36-37) or an editorial revision on the basis of the analogous place of the first section of Scherzo. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Tenuto slurs |
2. See the adjacent 
