Issues : Inaccuracies in GC
b. 208-209
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The shorter slur of GE is, according to us, inaccurate, which can be partially attributed to the sweeping slur of GC. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||||
b. 232
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GC and FE1 (→FE2→FE3) there is no before the top most note of the 3rd crotchet in the R.H. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in GE, EE and FE4. In all sources a was unnecessarily repeated before g1 in the chord in the L.H. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||||
b. 259-260
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we give a pedalling based on GC, in which we move the sign in bar 259, written by the copyist probably one quaver too early, to the 3rd beat of the bar, in accordance with the harmonic sense. According to us, the authenticity of the pedalling of EE cannot be excluded, which, as a result, can be considered to be equivalent. The oversight of the aforementioned in FE is a patent mistake, however, in the absence of sufficient premises, the place where it should be added cannot be indicated. Moreover, patent oversights of the engravers are the absence of the sign at the end of bar 260 in FE and the total absence of the pedalling in GE1, which, in GE2 was precisely corrected after GC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||||
b. 263-264
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
It is not certain who interpreted Chopin's intention in [A] more accurately – the copyist in GC (→GE) or the engraver of FE (→EE). According to us, an earlier change of pedal in FE seems to be less likely. The notation of GC may be interpreted in three ways, out of which the literal interpretation, adopted in GE2, is dubious from the pianistic point of view. The remaining two – given in GE1 and our main text – are natural from the pianistic point of view and can be considered to be equal. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||||||||
b. 265-266
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |