Leaving aside the unorthographical notation, the version with d1 (=e
1) is not excluded, as far as the sound is concerned. In spite of this, according to us, it is highly likely that the absence of the 
returning d
1 is Chopin's mistake. It is proved by:
-
the notation of bars 184-185, proving Chopin's care for a precise differentiation of the enharmonic notation of d and e;
- a high number of situations, in which there is no sign in Chopin's pieces, cancelling the previous alteration;
-
a flat restoring d1, added in EE in analogous bar 183; the base text to EE1 was corrected by Chopin, hence the addition can come from him.
In the discussed bar 143 a before d1 is only in EE2. In turn, in GE2 a was added before c1, which could be considered to be a mechanical error, if it was not for the fact that an identical addition was introduced in bar 183.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, Errors in EE, Omissions to cancel alteration, Errors in GE, GE revisions, Errors of GC
notation: Pitch