![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Page:
Source:
p. 4, b. 65-84
GE1 - First German edition
Prezentacja
Select
![](/build/images/x_button.png)
The two-bar-long slur in FE (→EE) is most probably inaccurate – in bars 11-12 the same notation of [A] was interpreted differently, as two slurs. If the slurs in [A] had a similar range to these visible in GC, the engraver's doubts may be considered to be justified. At the same time, it is an indication that in bars 7-8 and 61-62, it is probably the slurs of FE that are inaccurate.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, Inaccurate slurs in A
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
FESch, FES, FED, FE2, FE3, FE4, GE1, GE2, EE1, EE2, GC, FE5, GE2mar, Amar