Issues : Errors in FE

b. 71

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III

Chord in GC (→GE) & FE2 (→EE,FE3FE4,FE5)

Octave in FE1

..

FE1 overlooked the middle notes of the chord in the R.H. on the 3rd beat of the bar. The mistake was corrected already in FE2. See also the next note.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions

b. 71

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III

c2-f2-c3 in GC (→GE) & FE5

c2-c3 in FE1 (→EE,FE2FE3FE4)

..

In FE1 and subsequent impressions of FE of the entire Sonataf2 on the 4th beat of the bar was overlooked. The mistake remained without correction also in EE, in turn, it was corrected in FE5, probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bars 17, 25 and 79.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions

b. 72-80

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III

..

Same as in bars 18 and 26, in GC (→GE1) and FE (→EE1) there are no naturals raising g2 to g2 at the beginning of bars 72 and 80 (both or one). Chopin's oversight was corrected in EE1 in bar 72, whereas in EE2 and GE2mar (→GE2) in both bars.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Last key signature sign

b. 74

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III

..

Similarly as in bar 20, due to Chopin's mistake in [A], the correct notation of the trill appeared in the editions – despite the proofreading of FE3 – only in GE2 and EE2. The mistake was corrected in all pupil's copies.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Annotations in FES , Authentic corrections of FE , Annotations in FESch

b. 76-77

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III

Slur in GC (→GE1)

Slur in FE3 (→FE4,FE5) & GE2mar (→GE2)

Slurs in EE

Our variant suggestion

..

The analysis of all four analogous places (bars 14-16, 22-24, 68-70 and 76-78) leads to a conclusion that the slur of GE1, based on an interpretation of the abbreviated notation of GC using the "copy and paste" method, is probably inaccurate. The two remaining versions, being certainly (FE3) or probably (EE) a result of proofreading entries of Chopin, can be, in turn, considered to be authentic. We base the main text on EE, whose concordance with Chopin's idea is, according to us, most likely. We give the slur present only in EE in a variant form (in brackets), as in this edition one cannot entirely exclude the reviser's intervention.
FE1 (→FE2) do not include slurs at all, which is a patent error.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of EE