Issues : GE revisions
b. 21-22
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
The absence of the slur in GC (→GE1) is undoubtedly a mistake of the copyist. In GE2mar (→GE2) the sign was added on the basis of analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
On the basis of analysis of all four analogous places – see bars 14-16 – in the main text we give slurs based on the version of FE and EE (FE5 does not include slurs here, which is a patent error). We suggest the slur at the transition between bars 22-23, which could have been added by Chopin in the base text to EE, in a variant form, in brackets. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , Corrections in A , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III
..
The signs in GC and FE may be considered to be equal variants. Due to the reasons discussed in bar 16, in the main text we give the version of FE. The absence of the sign in GE1 is a patent error, corrected inaccurately (arbitrarily) in subsequent GE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt III category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |