The 
and 
indications added in EE1 may come from Chopin, added together with cresc. - - in the previous bars. However, their authenticity raises doubts:
-
leading crescendo until seems to be precocious, if we take into consideration the scale and the dynamic structure of the entire Marche;
- in EE the typeface of the dashes marking the range of cresc. is different in bar 60 than in the previous bars. It can indicate a later addition of dynamic indications in this place, which could also include the signs in bars 61-62;
-
in EE2 was changed to
, which, unless it is an arbitrary revision, may be a correction of an erroneous interpretation of Chopin entry in the base text to EE1.
There are three possibilities:
-
the strongly contrasting and indications in EE1 are authentic;
-
Chopin wrote only and , which was misinterpreted in EE1 and corrected in EE2;
- none of these indications is authentic.
In this case, in the main text we do not include the indications of EE, alternatively, we suggest, however, two variant solutions.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations
issues: EE revisions, Authentic corrections of EE
notation: Verbal indications