Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
..
Mistaken spelling of the word accelerando in GE (→EE) most probably stems from [A], cf. Impromptu in A category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 61-66
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
..
In GE the slur at the end of bar 65 points clearly to a continuation but there is not any in bar 66, first in a new system. A similar inaccuracy also occurs in an analogous situation in bars 73-74. Doubts about the compass of the slur are dispelled, in the editors' opinion, by the script in bars 69-70, where the slur reaches univocally the minim in bar 70. FE repeats literally the unclear GE notation. The slur in EE ends in bar 66. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
|
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
..
In EE, the shape of the R.H. accents was arbitrarily changed. The same situation can be found in bar 93. We adopt the notation of GE (→FE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 78-79
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
..
In GE particular words in the indication cresc. ed accelerando are linked with a dashed line. FE omitted the line, and EE supplemented it. Both changes are inauthentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
|
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
..
The indication accelerando is written in the sources in an abbreviated form: acceller. in GE (→FE), and accel. in EE. We delete the superfluous second 'l', and in the main text we change the seldom used Chopin's abbreviation for the full indication. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
Op. 29, bars 
