![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 41-44
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
..
We give the indication crescendo and the dashes defining its extent according to GE. In FE the dashes are omitted, a typical inaccuracy for this edition, and EE has no indication whatsoever. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE |
||||||||||
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||
b. 41
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
..
The sources display the lower note of the octave E category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
..
The lack of slur in FE (→EE1→EE2) is most probably the result of an oversight of the engraver. EE3 added a slur probably after GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||||
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
..
In the editors' opinion, the placement of accents in GE does not necessarily reflect the notation of [A]. If Chopin wrote accents between the staves (like in the preceding bar) then the signs could overlap with the slur and Lack of signs in FE (→EE) is certainly a mistake.
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »