![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Annotations in teaching copies
b. 26-30
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give Chopin fingering, written in FES in bars 154-158 (cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 17). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The sources illustrate here Chopin's hesitation – c category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Corrections in A , Chopin's hesitations |
|||||
b. 29-30
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The tie sustaining b1 is absent in all base sources of the Waltz, hence we do not include it in the main text. However, the version of FED is most probably an authentic variant – ties are added there also in bars 27-28 and 155-156 and 157-158. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The fingering in FED could have been written by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 66-71
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Both source versions of the melody at the transition between bars 66 and 67 and 70 and 71 are almost certainly authentic. In the main text, we give an unequivocally authentic version with repeated e category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |