Issues : EE revisions
b. 92-93
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The visible evolution of the accompanying part generally consisted in an each time earlier introduction of the diminished seventh chord – in As on the last beat of bar 93, in AI – a crotchet earlier, in the version intended for print – already in bar 92. In both earlier autographs, the bars are an exact repetition of bars 76-77 (also in the melodic line); in turn, in the final version, Chopin clearly differentiated between the mood of the phrase's climax – for the first time, the diminished chord naturally introduces a D major cadence; for the second time, the harmonic course is dramatically suspended on this chord, whereas the descending phrase in the R.H. carefully avoids any associations with the D major key. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Accompaniment changes |
||||||||||
b. 106
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 131
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we unify the range of the hairpins in bars 131-132 and 135-136 on the basis of the notation of A in bar 3 and 7-8. The signs in FE begin earlier and in the remaining editions they were extended even more: in GE1op and GE1no2 on the right-hand side, in the remaining – on the left-hand side. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 138-139
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
EEW1 and GE1no2 overlooked the hairpin. It is probably an oversight (in the case of EEW1 almost certainly – the signs were overlooked also in bars 140-141 and 142-144). The signs were added in EEW2 and GE2no2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 140-141
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The interpretation of the range of in A – see bar 13. The solution adopted by us finds confirmation in the notation of FE (→EEC), being probably a result of a proofreading, a Chopin one. It is indicated by the absence of the hairpin both in GE1op and GE1no2, which makes us assume that it was originally absent in FE too. In turn, the missing sign in EEW1 is certainly an oversight – the hairpin was overlooked also in adjacent bars 138-139 and 142-144. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |