Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
b. 133-134
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The lack of the hairpin in the majority of GE is probably a result of an oversight of the engraver of FE, which was then corrected in the very FE (→EE). The sign was added in GE2no2 too. We reproduce the range of the sign on the basis of the notation of A. Cf. bars 3-4. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 136-152
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
A cautionary before d in bars 136 and 152 is absent in A – the signs were added, perhaps at Chopin's request, in the proofreading of FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 136-137
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In the main text, we give the most certain slurs of A, as far as the sources are concerned. Omission of both slurs in GE1op and GE1no2 may mean that they were originally absent also in FE (cf. bars 138-139), in which, however, a slur in bar 137 was added in the last proofreading. The addition – perhaps coming from Chopin – certainly does not mean that bar 136 is to be devoid of a slur, in turn, it confirms the use of a new slur for bar 137 (cf. bars 8-9). The slurs added in later GE – different for each of two versions of this edition – are certainly revisions of the editors, modelled on analogous bars 8-9 (GE2op) or 152-153 (GE2no2). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 138-139
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the slur in both versions of GE1 means that most probably it was originally absent in FE too, in which, however, it was added – probably by Chopin – in the last phase of proofreading. The slurs added in later GE, embracing two full bars, are a result of a revision, same as in bars 10-11. In turn, an earlier beginning of the slur in EEC may be simply an inaccuracy. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 140-141
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The interpretation of the range of in A – see bar 13. The solution adopted by us finds confirmation in the notation of FE (→EEC), being probably a result of a proofreading, a Chopin one. It is indicated by the absence of the hairpin both in GE1op and GE1no2, which makes us assume that it was originally absent in FE too. In turn, the missing sign in EEW1 is certainly an oversight – the hairpin was overlooked also in adjacent bars 138-139 and 142-144. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |