b. 103-104
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of in FE (→EE,GE1op,GE1no2) is certainly an oversight. The sign was added in later GE, placing its beginning 2 quavers earlier. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 103-120
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
In As bars 103-104 are a repetition of bars 39-40, as a result of which they also have two versions. The same applies to bars 119-120, not written out in As. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 103-119
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bars 40 and 56, Chopin hesitated whether the last quaver in bars 104 and 120 is to be a f2 or f2 and the final decision is not unambiguous. In the main text, we give the version with f2, written in A (→FE) and made more precise by the way we adopted in our system with a cautionary . The version with f2, as well as the notation without an accidental, leaving a minor margin of uncertainty, can be considered to be equal variants. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations |