Issues : GE revisions
b. 170
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bar 42, the triad version of the majority of the sources, reproducing – perhaps inaccurately – the difficult to decipher notation of A, is, according to us, most probably erroneous. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 173-174
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The discrepancy in the placement of the sign between A and FE is, according to us, a result of a mistake at combining the written out bars with their numerated repetitions – the shorter pedal of FE is compatible with the authentic pedalling in bars 189-190. In the main text, we stick to the version of A. The changes in later GE were introduced most probably by analogy to bars 45-46 and 109-110 (see also bars 189-190). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 182-183
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Same as in bars 54-55, combining the slurs in GE2no2 is a revision contrary to the Chopin notation. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 188
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
The absence of pedalling in a part of the editions is undoubtedly a consequence of an oversight of the engraver of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 189-190
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
Similarly as in bars 61-62, in later GE the pedalling in bars 189-190 was changed after bars 45-46. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |