Pitch
|
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In A Chopin overlooked the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
|
|
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In A there is no cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
|
|
b. 93-98
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The notation of the accidentals in this fragment of A is inaccurate – there is not any flat lowering e2(1) to e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|
|
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In the manuscripts there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A |
|
|
b. 100
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In A there are no accidentals in the part of the R.H. This patent in this context oversight was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
lowering b to b
(the sign is present in 
before a. In this context, it must be considered an oversight, particularly taking into account the fact that the sign was written in