![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 70-71
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The continuous slur introduced in later GE, in spite of being musically justified, is, however, contrary to the notation of A and the remaining editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||
b. 90
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In A Chopin overlooked the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||
b. 93-102
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||
b. 97-98
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
Sustaining the chord at the transition between the bars is certainly an arbitrary revision of GE2op (→GE3op), introduced by analogy to identical bars 93-94. Both autographs prove that Chopin considered the version of bars 93-94 to be a one-off rhythmic diversification of the four-time repeated scheme. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||
b. 98
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In the manuscripts there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »