mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 70-83
p. 1, b. 1-14
p. 2, b. 15-24
p. 3, b. 25-39
p. 4, b. 40-54
p. 5, b. 55-69
p. 6, b. 70-83
Main text
Main text
FC - Fontana's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Another copy of #GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
FC - Fontana's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Another copy of #GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link Main text

  b. 81-82

 in FC (→GE)

 in FE

 &  in EE

Both lack of the  sign in FE and its independence from  in EE is, according to us, an inaccuracy of notation (extension of the hairpins in EE could have resulted from, e.g., an inaccurate interpretation of this sign in the context of the abbreviation of notation used in the base text).

Learn more »

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE inaccuracies

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FED, FEJ, FES
Complete ➔