Issues : EE revisions
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text, we give the title and dedication after the title page of the entire Opus in FC and FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
It is hard to assume how the difference between the versions of FE and EE1 and these of FC (→GE) and EE2 (→EE3) occurred. In FC, the naturals introducing a are written by the copyist, which means that they were present in the manuscript, probably an autograph copied by Fontana. Therefore, the absence of these signs in FE and EE1 could be explained by their later deletion by Chopin in the base texts to these editions. Hence a regular, chromatic progression of minor thirds in the middle voices would be then introduced only in bar 54 as a kind of variation of the repetition of this place. However, not being certain if it was so – the versions of FE and EE1 could have been results of mistakes – in the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic version of FC (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Last key signature sign |
||||||||||||||||
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
The cautionary before d is included in EE and GE. The sign in EE may be authentic, yet an editorial revision is more likely, same as in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||||||||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In the main text we give long accents, written most probably by Chopin in FC. In this copy, one can also see deletions of the previously written accents under the part of the L.H., which shows that the double accents of FE is a previous version. Lack of the signs in EE1 (→EE2) is certainly a mistake, corrected in EE3 on the basis of GE1. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |