Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 41-42
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
All source notations certainly mean the same – an accent referring to both notes struck in the middle of the bar. In the main text we adopt the version with two accents – see bars 13-14. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
|
b. 43-44
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
Same as in the previous two bars, all source notations certainly mean the same – an accent referring to both notes on the 9th semiquaver of the bar. Marking it with a pair of accents could have been introduced into the base text to EE by Chopin, although additions of single accents by the editor also seem to be likely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||
|
b. 45-46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
In these bars Chopin was also looking for a deft way of marking the accents referring simultaneously to the parts of both hands (cf. bars 29-32 and 41-44). In the main text, in both texts we adopt pairs of accents used in FE – most probably by Chopin – in the 2nd half of bar 46. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||
|
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
GE1 added a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
|
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 25 No 12, Etude in C minor
..
GE1 has an erroneous G instead of F as the last semiquaver in the L.H., which was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
before the 9th semiquaver in the L.H. The unnecessary sign was removed in