Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The use of the time signature surprises only in GE1, as in FE the indication was not used in the Etudes – contrary to the manuscripts – at all, both in Op. 25 and in Op. 10 and the Etude in F minor, Dbop. 36 No. 1 (cf. also the Impromptu in A major, Op. 29). In any case, the correctness and authenticity of the time signature is undeniable towards the compatible version of GC and EE. The correct time signature was returned in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Changes of metre , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , 4/4 or 2/2 |
|||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The wedge in GC, confirmed by EE, was reproduced in GE as a staccato dot. Therefore, the evaluation of the authenticity of the dot in FE also advises caution. The tendency to interpret wedges as dots was very clear in the B&H publishing houses – cf., e.g., the Nocturne in D major, Op. 27 No. 2, bar 12 or the Scherzo in C minor, Op. 39, bar 18. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Wedges |
|||
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The too early placed ending of the octave sign makes the 4th semiquaver of the 2nd half of the bar in FE sound as b1 instead of b2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Before the 5th semiquaver there is no in GC and FE. This patent inaccuracy of Chopin was corrected in GE. EE also includes the correct text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |