![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 13-16
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
In GC, the moment of beginning the slurs in bars 13 and 14 falls quite far before the dotted quaver on the 2nd beat of the bar. In spite of this, there is no doubt that they concern only the phrase led with the chords in bars 13-14 and its repetition in bars 15-16. The slurs of GE1 must be then considered as erroneous. Cf. bars 7-8. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC |
||||||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
Before the 1st semiquaver of the last group, GC and FE have no accidental, which, due to the fact that 11 previous notes in the R.H. (together with d
GC (→GE1) and FE repeated the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||
b. 20-22
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
GE added staccato dots at the beginning of bars 20 and 22 – both in GE1, only the second one in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor
..
The missing slurs in the majority of the sources must be considered as Chopin's oversight. We suggest slurs used in analogous bars 7-8. An identical addition was introduced already in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |