mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : GE revisions

b. 62

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

..

In GC (→GE1) there is no  before f3 at the beginning of the bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals

b. 64

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

Wedges in GC, EE & GE2 (→GE3)

R.H. wedge in FE

Dots in GE1
..

Lack of the wedge for the L.H. may correspond to the notation of the base text to FE, however, it cannot be excluded that the engraver confused the wedge for a fingering numeral. In the remaining sources the wedges are present in the parts of both hands (except for GE1, in which the signs were undoubtedly misinterpreted as staccato dots).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Wedges

b. 65

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

..

In GC the triplets in the R.H. have a quaver beam. This patent error was corrected in GE.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC

b. 69

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

..

In GE1 there are unnecessary naturals before b3 and a3, yet there is no  lowering b3 to b3. GE2 (→GE3) include the correct notation.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 72

composition: Op. 25 No 11, Etude in A minor

No fingering in GC, FE, EE1 (→EE2) & GE2 (→GE3)

'1' in GE1 & EE3
..

Same as in bar 69, we assume that in GC, in which bars 69-78 are not written out with notes, the fingering should not be considered (the rule was adopted in FE, GE2 and GE3, partially also in EE). The engraver of GE1 gave here a numeral, which was copied in EE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions