Page: 
Source: 
p. 5, b. 79-103
p. 1, b. 1-13
p. 2, b. 14-28
p. 3, b. 29-53
p. 4, b. 54-78
p. 5, b. 79-103
p. 6, b. 104-119
Main text
Main text
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Another copy of #GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Another copy of #GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 100-101

in GC (→GE) & EE

No second part of indication in FE

The sotto voce indication was completed in GC and probably in the base text to EE. In GC one can see that Chopin initially wrote a different indication (probably e legato only), to eventually choose e sempre legato.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Chopin's hesitations, Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Verbal indications

Missing markers on sources: GC, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3