Page:
Source:
p. 4, b. 54-78
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
It is hard to state whether the lack of extending dot of f
in GE1 is a revision – by analogy to bar 50 – or a mistake. The version of GE2 (→GE3) does not find justification in the sources.
It is also unclear how the tie sustaining f in FE is to be considered. It could be Chopin proofreading, yet also an earlier version or even a mistake, as the tie is absent both in analogous bars 50-51 and the remaining sources. Therefore, we do not include it in the main text.
See b. 50
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: GE revisions
notation: Rhythm
Missing markers on sources:
GC, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3