![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in EE
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GC, FE and EE there are no accidentals before the 9th quaver, so it is not entirely clear whether it is to be read as e In EE1 the top note of the part of the R.H. is mistakenly written as d3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The authenticity of the version of EE cannot be excluded, yet, according to us, a mistake is more likely here, e.g., due to the similarity of the 2nd half of the bar to bar 34. Chopin resigned from striking b in similar places only when the note was being performed by the L.H. (bars 34, 42 and analog.) or when the 1st finger of the R.H. remained on the d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||
b. 113
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In GC (→GE1) and EE, there are no accidentals before the crotchets, so they should read as c
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of GC |