![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 67
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
It is hard to state whether the lack of extending dot of f
It is also unclear how the tie sustaining f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 70
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In the main text we give an accent on the 3rd beat of the bar, compatible with the sign present in all sources in analogous bar 50. The long accent ( category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 74-77
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
When interpreted literally, the short slurs of GC (→GE1) are almost certainly erroneous due to the breaking of the slur between bars 73-74, contrary to the construction of the phrase. The suggested interpretation is based on the original slurring of analogous bars 55-57, in which Chopin combined the one-bar slurs in bars 55-56, written initially in GC. The phrasing may be considered as alternative with respect to the main text, based on FE and compatible with the slurring of analogous bars 54-57. The continuous slur in GE2 (→GE3) is a result of an arbitrary revision, yet the same slur in EE may be authentic. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
|||||||||
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Deletion of the tie of d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |