mUltimate Chopin

Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Slurs
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

Slurs

b. 103

composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor

Slur ended in GC, FE, EE & GE2 (→GE3)

Slur continued in GE1
..

The slur of GE1 is a consequence of literal interpretation of an inaccurate slur of GC in bar 104.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 104

composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor

Continued slur in GC (literal reading→GE1)

New slur in GC (contextual interpretation), FE, EE & GE2 (→GE3)
..

The first slur in the R.H., in GC started too early and moved to the left, confused the engraver of GE1 who combined it with the previous one. The remaining inaccurate slurs of GC in this bar were interpreted correctly, in accordance with the version of the remaining sources.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 115-118

composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor

Slur from bar 115 in GC & GE2 (→GE3)

Slur from bar 116 in GE1

No slur in FE & EE
..

The slur for the L.H. – added most probably by Chopin – is only in GC (→GE; in GE1, as a result of mistake, the slur starts only in bar 116). The beginning of the slur suggests continuation, however, as it is unknown, in which moment it should start earlier, we assume that it concerns only these notes under which it is written.

Compare the passage in the sources »

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections in GC