



Rhythm
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 80
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 86
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
In the main text we suggest – after GE2 (→GE3) – the solutions adopted in analogous bars 46 and 66. Lack of additions in bars 85 and 87 proves that by correcting and completing the Stichvorlage manuscripts, Chopin omitted, probably by distraction, the third appearance of this fragment. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 93
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
According to us, the value of the dotted minim, with which the b1 note is provided in GC (→GE1), is not a mistake – the note can be considered as belonging to two voices: melodic, led in octaves, and accompanying, creating the whole-bar-long filling of the octave melody together with e1. The notation used by Chopin can be, however, misleading (the sum of the rhythmic values of the top voice gives 4 crotchets), therefore, in the main text we suggest its modified version, in which we use the authentic graphical layout of FE. The version of EE may be a result of revision of such notation as in GC. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 95-98
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
It is hard to state how the difference between the sources was created, as the traces of corrections are to be seen neither in GC nor in FE. Due to the fact that no source features a tie sustaining F category imprint: Differences between sources |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »