![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
b. 47
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
Chopin added the grace note in GC (it is written with his hand) and in the proofreading of FE (one can see that there was no space for it). The improvement was also introduced in EE2 (→EE3), most probably on the basis of comparison with FE. In all editions the sign has a form of a slashed, small quaver, which undoubtedly corresponds to the performance of this ornament, however, it is contrary to double – here and in bar 67 – Chopin's own entry in GC. In the main text we give the undoubtedly authentic notation of GC, as in the case of the slashed grace note in FE there it is uncertain whether it actually corresponds to Chopin entry in the proof copy.
The issue of cautionary sharps before the grace note and d category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 47-49
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The dim. - - indication could have been added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE, although it cannot be excluded that the addition was added still in the base text (cf. bars 67-69). Similarly in bars 87-89. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The accent under a category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 58-60
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
..
The slur embracing the phrase in the middle voice was added by Chopin most probably in the proofreading of FE. The sign is, however, inaccurately placed – in bar 58, ending a line of the text, the slur begins on the stave, yet its continuation in bars 59-60 is under the stave, which hinders its interpretation. In the analogous place in bars 78-80, the slur is already clearly placed. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||||||
b. 59-62
|
composition: Op. 25 No 10, Etude in B minor
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |