Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 37-38
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
In GC, the version beginning from G1 was written by Chopin instead of the original version of FE, beginning from the sixth. This undeniable improvement was also introduced in the base text to EE1, in which, however, it was reproduced inaccurately – both B1 at the beginning of the bar and the lack of tie sustaining d are most probably mistakes. In turn, EE1 includes a dot extending the des crotchet, overlooked in GC. This inaccuracy of the notation of GC was corrected only in GE3, which, thanks to this, is the only source in which the final version is written flawlessly. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions , Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections in GC |
||||||||||||||||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
The notation of GC does not clearly show whether the indication is to be valid from the 2nd or 3rd quaver in the bar. It results from the fact of performing corrections in the L.H. and from the related to it insecurity whether to consider the relation of this sign to the part of the L.H. at all and if the answer is affirmative, whether to refer to the original version ( was written prior to the corrections) or to the final one. In the main text we give the sign in accordance with [A], reconstructed on the basis of the compatible version of GC prior to the correction and FE and EE. The versions of GE1 and GE2 (→GE3) constitute only possible interpretations of this notation, whereas only the second one can have a different meaning than the main text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |