data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
Same as in the previous bars, the accents are a result of Chopin additions in GC and (most probably) in the base text to EE. The first two signs are clearly longer, however, according to us, it follows from the intention of clearly writing the signs overlapping the slur. The missing second one in GE1 is most probably an oversight (cf. the note concerning the chord in the L.H.), yet it is hard to state what was the reason of omitting this sign in EE. See also the note on articulation in this bar. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
The arpeggio sign before the 2nd chord in the L.H., present only in FE, was most probably added by Chopin in the base text to this edition or at the time of proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 25 No 9, Etude in G♭ major
..
Omitting the a category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of GE |