Page:
Source:
p. 4, b. 50-68
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
b. 57-58
There are no grounds to consider the fingering of EE2 (→EE3) – otherwise very natural – to be authentic. The fifth finger on f in bar 58 is undoubtedly a mistake (it was meant to be the fourth).
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in EE
notation: Fingering
Missing markers on sources:
GC, GE1, EE3, EE1, EE2, GE2, GE3, FE1, FE2, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1a