EE
compare
b. 57-58
There are no grounds to consider the fingering of EE2 (→EE3) – otherwise very natural – to be authentic. The fifth finger on f in bar 58 is undoubtedly a mistake (it was meant to be the fourth).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in EE
notation: Fingering