![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Placing the metronome indication already at the beginning of the Etude may be a result of the routine interpretation of the engravers of FE and EE who did not see a reason to separate it from the Lento indication. Cf. the Etude in A minor, No. 11, bars 1-5. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Both the absence of the slur in GC (→GE1) and the one-bar slur of FE have to be considered as an inaccuracy of notation. In turn, the slur of EE is most probably authentic and we adopt it as the base of the main text. However, we shift its beginning in such a way that it included also the grace note, as it can be seen in analogous situations in GC (bars 1 and 45) and FE (bar 45). It cannot be excluded that the copyist confused the staves and wrote the slur of the L.H., running from the beginning of the bar, over the R.H. A two-bar slur was added also in GE2 (→GE3), together with a conventional slur of the grace note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||||
b. 35
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The missing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||
b. 45
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
It is hard to state how the difference in the placement of category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The F category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections in GC |