Issues : Annotations in teaching copies
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The visible in FED deletion of the second of the grace notes indicating the beginning of the trill does not influence the performance, yet it proves that Chopin notation was incomprehensible already for some of his pupils. The notation – indicating the beginning of the trill from the bottom second – remains one of the most frequent reasons of misinterpretation of the Chopin text. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
||||||||
b. 56
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 58
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the long accent, written in FES, in brackets as authentic and unobvious interpretation suggestion. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
b. 60-61
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The sign, added by Chopin in FES, proves that the different indications present, on the one hand, in FE (accent) and, on the other, in GC (→GE) and EE (crescendo), may be considered as complementary. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Inaccuracies in FE , Annotations in FES , Authentic corrections of FE |