![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 29-30
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In GC, FE and EE1 (→EE2) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Annotations in FES |
||||||
b. 42-43
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The ten. indication in bar 43 – present both in FE and GC (→GE) – was most probably already in the manuscripts. In turn, the one in bar 42 was most probably added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE, which is indicated by the bigger font in comparison with the remaining ones (in bars 18-19 and 43). The appearance of one ten. in EE3 proves the access of the reviser to GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
Taking into account the highly predictable structure of the chromatic scale, we do not include cautionary accidentals in it. FE includes a category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 52
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The missing category imprint: issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |