data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
In GC (→GE1) and EE there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
It is hard to evaluate how the difference in the range of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
One cannot see traces of performing changes in the rhythm of the top voice in the preserved sources. Moreover, it does not seem that one of the versions could have been erroneous; it is particularly excluded in the case of the rhythm of GC (→GE) and EE, confirmed by the compatible version of all sources in analogous bar 48. Therefore, it seems that the original single dotted rhythm, preserved in FE, was changed by Chopin into the double dotted rhythm in the base text to EE, from where it was copied to GC. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Accompaniment changes , Dotted or even rhythm |