![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : GE revisions
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
The sharp returning c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors of FC |
|||||||||
b. 17-18
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
In FC (→GE1) and FE there are no sharps returning d category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
Same as previously, FE, EE1 and GE1 misinterpreted the abbreviated notation of FC and remaining Stichvorlage manuscripts, giving the 2nd, 3rd and 4th groups of semiquavers without any accidentals. The mistake was corrected in EE2 (→EE3) and GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||
b. 24-25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
Different source slurring of these bars does not prove, according to us, various versions of phrasing, yet it only confirms difficulties with which one is faced at the time of interpreting slurs in Chopin autographs. In EE, the fact of embracing the entire discussed fragment with one slur, unconvincing from the piano and musical point of view, probably results from the panache, with which the slur was written in the manuscript (autograph or Gutmann's copy), which was supposed to start over the 2nd quaver in bar 25 – if its beginning falls already on the 1st quaver, the engraver could have assumed that it is about the link with the preceding D-G category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 25 No 6, Etude in G♯ minor
..
According to us, the earlier pedal release than in similar situations may be a result of Chopin's mistake, who, while introducing the pedalling, most probably in the already finished pitch and rhythm text, only saw the change of the chord and did not check its sound. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a variant solution. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |