![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors of FC
b. 14-16
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
There is no category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
The traces, visible in FC in the part of the L.H., show that the copyist initially wrote here the chords from bar 31, which, after having noticed his error, he erased and replaced with the correct ones. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of FC |
|||
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
In FC (→GE1) there are no arpeggio signs in this bar. It is certainly an oversight of the copyist, which forgot to introduce the wavy lines on the new page of the manuscript. The signs, present both in FE and EE, were added in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||
b. 76
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
On the 3rd beat of the bar in FC, one can see a correction – the b and b1 notes were added after a category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors of FC |
|||
b. 86
|
composition: Op. 25 No 5, Etude in E minor
..
As the 9th semiquaver, FC (→GE1) features a g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |