data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
GE1
compare
Nothing indicates that the detailed fingering of the R.H., added in EE2 (→EE3), could have come from Chopin. The digit for the 4th quaver in bar 64 is certainly erroneous; the double fingering for the 3rd quaver in bar 63 can also be a mistake.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions
notation: Fingering