Page: 
Source: 
p. 3, b. 33-48
p. 1, b. 1-16
p. 2, b. 17-32
p. 3, b. 33-48
p. 4, b. 49-65
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FC - Fontana's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected reprint of GE1
GE1b - Flawed impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FC - Fontana's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected reprint of GE1
GE1b - Flawed impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 46

No sign in A (→FCGE) & EE

 in FE

Our variant suggestion

The  sign, added by Chopin in a proofreading of FE, proves that at the last stage of shaping of the Etude's notation, the composer decided to consolidate this way of interpretation – at least here, for the second time – in spite of the fact that earlier (cf. bar 8) he did not seem to be so adamant. In addition, it is justified by the combination of this crescendo with the preceding it pair of hairpins, suggested by us for the first time, in bar 8. On the other hand, the sound image of the entire section embracing bars 39-53 is clearly different in FE than in FC – the only three dynamic signs appear in FE in bars 44-46. Taking this into consideration, we assume that in the main text, generally based on FC, a possibility of omitting the discussed  in bar 46 should be left to the performers.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

Missing markers on sources: FC, A, EE1, EE2, EE3, FE1, FE2, GE3, FED, FEJ, FES, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE1b