![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
Adding the second wedge under this chord in FE seems to be an argument for an intention to leave this sign. On the other hand, Chopin did not add it in FC, as he probably did with the wedges in bar 16. Therefore, in the main text we leave the inclusion of this sign at the discretion of the performer. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 21
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The slur in FC was almost certainly added by Chopin, who added an analogous slur while proofreading FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
|||||||
b. 27
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The value of quaver for g2 is most probably the original version, inadvertently left in A (→FC→GE). It is indicated by the deleted slurs visible in A, grouping the chords in two in this bar. The value of crotchet was introduced probably in the base text to EE and in proofreading of FE. Cf. the adjacent note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The last dyad in the bottom voice seems to be a third in A, as the bottom note is written slightly too low. The visible in FE traces of correction prove that it actually misled the engraver and it must have been corrected in print. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccurate note pitch in A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 46
|
composition: Op. 25 No 4, Etude in A minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |