data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The absence of in GE1 (→GE2) is undoubtedly the engraver's oversight. In turn, placing the sign in EE only under the 4th quaver may correspond to the notation of the base text – a similar placement of the signs (corrected) can be seen in GC in bars 29 and 43.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE, GE revisions, EE inaccuracies
notation: Verbal indications