Page: 
Source: 
p. 2, b. 15-32
p. 1, b. 1-14
p. 2, b. 15-32
p. 3, b. 33-50
p. 4, b. 51-69
Main text
Main text
AT - Autograph of a fragment
AW - Presentation Autograph
CDP - Copy for Delfina Potocka
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected reprint of GE1
GE1b - Flawed impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
AT - Autograph of a fragment
AW - Presentation Autograph
CDP - Copy for Delfina Potocka
GC - Gutmann's Copy
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected reprint of FE1
FED - Dubois copy
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz copy
FES - Stirling copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE1a - Corrected reprint of GE1
GE1b - Flawed impression of GE1
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Revised impression of GE2
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Corrected reprint of EE1
EE3 - Revised impression of EE2
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 20

In AT the last triplet in the part of the L.H. is at the same time the first figure of this type provided with a slur (not counting the four-note passage in bars 18-19). However, it is not clear from which note it is to be valid according to Chopin, whether from e or g1; according to us, the first possibility is more plausible. Moreover, the slur clearly leads beyond this triplet, as it would be difficult to indicate an unambiguous interpretation of such notation, which, in addition, may be devoid of any serious meaning.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues:

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: AT, AW, CDP, GC, FE1, FES, FED, FEJ, FE2, GE1, GE1a, GE2, GE3, EE1, EE2, EE3, GE1b