![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Authentic corrections of FE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 26-27
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The dynamic hairpins of FE and EE were most probably added by Chopin still in the copies, being base texts for these editions. Thus it is difficult to state whether it is EE with a pair of signs that is later or FE with category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
|||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
Lack of the pedal change on the 2nd beat of the bar does not seem to be a mistake – Chopin could have deleted the signs in the base text to FE or while proofreading this edition. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a variant solution. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
|||||||||
b. 48-49
|
composition: Op. 25 No 1, Etude in A♭ major
..
Chopin could have added the slur in the L.H. while proofreading FE. This kind of revision is highly unlikely in this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »