Page: 
Source: 
p. 6, b. 89-108
p. 1, b. 1-17
p. 2, b. 18-33
p. 3, b. 34-52
p. 4, b. 53-68
p. 5, b. 69-88
p. 6, b. 89-108
p. 7, b. 109-124
p. 8, b. 125-139
p. 9, b. 140-159
p. 10, b. 160-175
Main text
Main text
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
FED - Dubois Copy
FES - Stirling Copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Revised impression of GE3
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Select notes: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Differences
No differences
A - Autograph
FE - French edition
FE1 - First French edition
FE2 - Corrected impression of FE1
FEJ - Jędrzejewicz Copy
FED - Dubois Copy
FES - Stirling Copy
GE - German edition
GE1 - First German edition
GE2 - Second German edition
GE3 - Third German edition
GE4 - Revised impression of GE3
EE - English edition
EE1 - First English edition
EE2 - Revised impression of EE1
Importance
All
Important
Main
Prezentacja
Select 
copy link PDF Main text


  b. 107

Slur in A, EE & GE2 )→GE3GE4)

No slur in FE (→GE1)

FE (→GE1) omitted the slur in the L.H. It is undoubtedly an engraver's inaccuracy. Cf. the neighbouring note.

Compare the passage in the sources»

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, GE revisions

notation: Slurs

Missing markers on sources: A, FEJ, EE1, EE2