Issues : GE revisions
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
GE3 (→GE4→GE5) overlooked the additional stem and dot, extending the b1 quaver, probably due to inattention. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The absence of the last staccato dot for the bottom voice of the R.H. is undoubtedly a result of an inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. In turn, the oversight of all dots in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) is probably a revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
It is hard to state why the hairpins in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) were deleted. The graphic layout of the bar indicates rather an intentional action of the revisers than a possible engraving error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
In A Chopin undoubtedly overlooked the raising g1 to g1 in the written grupetto. He did not correct the mistake in the proofreadings of FE either. The necessary sign was added only by the revisers of GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) & EE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Errors of A , Last key signature sign |
||||||
b. 40
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The slur of A, although poorly written, is most probably supposed to begin in the middle of the bar, together with the continuation of the melody of the top voice. However, in FE (→GE1,EE) the slur started erroneously already from the 1st note in bar 40. In GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) an accurate revision was performed, by writing the slur from the beginning of the triplet. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |